ReviewOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
A review of North American orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries.
Review in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In North America, orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries can be broadly categorized into 4 groups: national registries without subscription, national registries with subscription, for-profit registries, and nontrauma-specific and insurance databases. In the United States, the National Trauma Data Bank is the largest national trauma registry and can be freely accessed but lacks many specifics and outcomes pertinent to patients with fracture as data are only for the inpatient stay. The Orthopaedic Trauma Association/American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Fracture and Trauma Registry is a 2-year-old subscription-based database designed to account for shortcomings in the now defunct Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture registry. Three additional registries exist with focused patient populations: Own the Bone (a subscription-based database focused on osteoporotic fractures and secondary prevention) and 2 military registries, the Department of Defense Trauma Registry and Military Orthopedic Trauma Registry (both restricted-access databases focusing on combat-related fractures and injuries sustained by military personnel). In Canada, there is no active national trauma registry. The previous National Trauma Registry was operational from 1997 to 2014, but closed because of limited use, reallocation of funding, and lack of data timeliness. Provincial trauma registries are the source of most trauma-specific registry data; however, most fragility fractures and other low-energy injuries are not captured. North America's most widely used registries, the National Trauma Data Bank and Canadian provincial registries, provide little data on fracture-specific outcomes. The addition of fracture-specific variables and outcomes would significantly enhance the ability for these registries to become a more valuable resource for orthopaedic surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.