Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799957›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Automated and interoperable methods for generalizable development of clinical machine-learning models for predicting neuromorbidity in critically ill children.

Ruoting Li, Christopher M Horvat, Mehdi Nourelahi, Eddie Pérez Claudio, Jason Hammett, Mark S Wainwright, Robert S B Clark, Alicia K Au, Harry Hochheiser

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruoting LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9138-4606
Christopher M HorvatDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1593-2252
Mehdi NourelahiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6986-3184
Eddie Pérez ClaudioDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8452-3778
Jason HammettAWS, Dublin, Ohio, USA.
Mark S WainwrightDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4736-7462
Robert S B ClarkDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0806-8005
Alicia K AuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6734-1262
Harry HochheiserDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-9982

Funding

The internship in Biomedical Research, Informatics, and Computer Science (iBRIC): Biomedical Informatics and Data Science research experiences for students from Minority Serving InstitutionsT15LM007059 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARRY S HOCHHEISER · 1987 to 2026
$23.9M
Bio-digital Rapid Alert to Identify NeuromorbidityR01NS118716 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AU, ALICIA K, CLARK, ROBERT S B · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118716NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To streamline the development of clinical machine learning (ML) models for predicting acute neurological morbidity in critically ill children by extending our prior work to create a standardized, reproducible, and scalable workflow leveraging Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR), cloud infrastructure, and automated ML tools. Methods: We developed workflow for extracting, cleaning, and modeling pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) data, using 168 biomarkers from 7,403 encounters at an academic Children's hospital between 2020 and 2024. Data were processed and stored in a compliant, secure cloud environment. We evaluated four feature sets: a baseline set from prior work, a complete set, a filtered set, and a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM)-selected set for prediction of acquired neurological morbidity. Automated ML was used to train, validate, and deploy models, with performance assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), F1 score, calibration metrics, and Shapley additive (SHAP) values. A FHIR-based version of the pipeline was also implemented and evaluated on a 2020 subset of the cohort. Results: Filtered and LightGBM-based feature sets achieved the highest predictive performance, with AUROCs of 0.90 (95% CI: [0.88-0.92]) for both, and AUPRCs of 0.68 (95% CI: [0.63-0.73]) and 0.67(95% CI: [0.62-0.72]), respectively. SHAP value analysis revealed consistent top features across models, with vital signs and key laboratory values prominently ranked. Models trained using FHIR-formatted data from a 2020 cohort (n = 1,339) demonstrated comparable performance to those built on the complete dataset, with an AUROC of 0.87 (95% CI: [0.81-0.93]). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a cloud-compatible, standards-based approach to clinical ML model development. By leveraging interoperable data formats and automated modeling workflows, this approach supports scalable, reproducible model construction and evaluation, enabling improved efficiency and transparency in clinical decision support.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision SupportCloud-Based AnalyticsFHIRPediatric Neurological morbidityPredictive Modeling

Identifiers

PMID40799957
PMCPMC12340867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.