ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Automated and interoperable methods for generalizable development of clinical machine-learning models for predicting neuromorbidity in critically ill children.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: To streamline the development of clinical machine learning (ML) models for predicting acute neurological morbidity in critically ill children by extending our prior work to create a standardized, reproducible, and scalable workflow leveraging Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR), cloud infrastructure, and automated ML tools. Methods: We developed workflow for extracting, cleaning, and modeling pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) data, using 168 biomarkers from 7,403 encounters at an academic Children's hospital between 2020 and 2024. Data were processed and stored in a compliant, secure cloud environment. We evaluated four feature sets: a baseline set from prior work, a complete set, a filtered set, and a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM)-selected set for prediction of acquired neurological morbidity. Automated ML was used to train, validate, and deploy models, with performance assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), F1 score, calibration metrics, and Shapley additive (SHAP) values. A FHIR-based version of the pipeline was also implemented and evaluated on a 2020 subset of the cohort. Results: Filtered and LightGBM-based feature sets achieved the highest predictive performance, with AUROCs of 0.90 (95% CI: [0.88-0.92]) for both, and AUPRCs of 0.68 (95% CI: [0.63-0.73]) and 0.67(95% CI: [0.62-0.72]), respectively. SHAP value analysis revealed consistent top features across models, with vital signs and key laboratory values prominently ranked. Models trained using FHIR-formatted data from a 2020 cohort (n = 1,339) demonstrated comparable performance to those built on the complete dataset, with an AUROC of 0.87 (95% CI: [0.81-0.93]). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a cloud-compatible, standards-based approach to clinical ML model development. By leveraging interoperable data formats and automated modeling workflows, this approach supports scalable, reproducible model construction and evaluation, enabling improved efficiency and transparency in clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.