Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799945›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Nonastreda multimodal dataset for efficient tool wear state monitoring.

Hubert Truchan, Zahra Ahmadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hubert TruchanL3S Research Center, Leibniz University Hannover, Appelstr. 4, 30167 Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany.
Zahra AhmadiPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, Hannover Medical School, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), there is a growing need to bridge the gap between multimodal learning capabilities and the availability of high-quality datasets for tool wear estimation. Industrial scenarios frequently require domain-specific knowledge, specialized datasets, and efficient deployment on resource-constrained edge devices that demand minimal memory, low latency, and optimized computational performance. While there has been a shift from unimodal sensor-based approaches to multisensory, multimodal strategies, this transition remains in its early stages. Developing feature extraction methods, multimodal fusion techniques, and correlation analysis frameworks is crucial for improving tool wear prediction models. Existing multimodal open-source datasets have several limitations in addressing these challenges:•They are often restricted to a specific set of data modalities, limiting adaptability.•They primarily feature general-purpose objects, which are not well-suited for industrial applications requiring specialized domain knowledge.•They lack support for lightweight models designed for real-time processing on edge devices.•They lack in-depth documentation or dedicated data loaders, limiting reproducibility. To bridge this gap, we introduce the

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionClassificationImagesRegressionRemaining useful lifeTime series

Identifiers

PMID40799945
PMCPMC12341703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.