Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799932›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Ensemble learning to enhance accurate identification of patients with glaucoma using electronic health records.

Tushar Mungle, Behzad Naderalvojoud, Chris A Andrews, Hong Su An, Amanda Bicket, Amy Zhang, Julie Rosenthal, Wen-Shin Lee, Chase A Ludwig, Bethlehem Mekonnen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tushar MungleDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2109-3248
Behzad NaderalvojoudDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4429-5341
Chris A AndrewsDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States.
Hong Su AnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States.
Amanda BicketDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States.
Amy ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States.
Julie RosenthalDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States.
Wen-Shin LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Chase A LudwigDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Bethlehem MekonnenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Suzann PershingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Joshua D SteinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, United States.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6553-3455
SOURCE Consortium

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN A BACCUS · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Using Informatics to Evaluate and Predict Cataract Surgery Impact on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias and Mild Cognitive Impairment OutcomesR01AG072582 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Suzann Pershing · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
Enhanced Identification of Ocular Phenotypes and Outcomes in Electronic Health Record DataR01EY032475 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STEIN, JOSHUA D · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Myopic Vitreoretinal PathologyK23EY035741 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Chase Axel Ludwig · 2024 to 2026
$822k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY035741NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032475NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Existing ophthalmology studies for clinical phenotypes identification in real-world datasets (RWD) rely exclusively on structured data elements (SDE). We evaluated the performance, generalizability, and fairness of multimodal ensemble models that integrate real-world SDE and free-text data compared to SDE-only models to identify patients with glaucoma. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 2 health systems- University of Michigan (UoM) and Stanford University (SU). It involves 1728 patients visiting eye clinics during 2012-2021. Free-text embeddings extracted using BioClinicalBERT were combined with SDE. EditedNearestNeighbor (ENN) undersampling and Borderline-Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (bSMOTE) addressed class imbalance. Lasso Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Classifier (SVC) models were trained on UoM imbalanced (imb) and resampled data along with bagging ensemble method. Models were externally validated with SU data. Fairness was assessed using equalized odds difference (EOD) and Target Probability Difference (TPD). Results: Among 900 and 828 patients from UoM and SU, 10% and 23% respectively had glaucoma as confirmed by ophthalmologists. At UoM, multimodal LR Discussion: Multimodal ensemble models integrating structured and unstructured EHR data outperformed traditional SDE models achieving fair predictions across demographic sub-groups. Among ensemble methods, bagging demonstrated better generalizability than stacking, particularly when training data is limited. Conclusion: This approach can enhance phenotype discovery to enable future research studies using RWD, leading to better patient management and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

class imbalanceclinical notesensemble learninggeneralizability and fairnessreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID40799932
PMCPMC12342940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.