ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Supercomplexity: bridging the gap between aesthetics and cognition.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging TIS-Enhanced Crayfish Optimization Algorithm for High-Precision Prediction of Long-Term Achievement in Mathematical Elite Talents.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Arts engagement, active inference, and allostatic regulation: a neurobiological framework for understanding the health effects of aesthetic experience.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Embodied neuroaesthetics and the psychotherapeutic relational field.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a cognitive neuroscience framework for understanding what we term "supercomplex experiences," a concept describing experiences that simultaneously engage multiple neural networks and cognitive faculties in ways that resist decomposition into simpler processes. Drawing on recent advances in network neuroscience, we argue that these experiences emerge from the coordinated activity of distributed brain systems, including the salience network, default mode network, and central executive network. These experiences are distinguished by five essential characteristics: (1) simultaneous engagement of multiple neural networks, (2) specialized neural architectures developed through training, (3) specialized conceptual frameworks and vocabularies, (4) emergent properties from dynamic interactions, and (5) coherent gestalt properties. Through examination of expert performance in domains such as wine tasting, musical performance, visual art, perfumery, and several others we reveal how these experiences are characterized by sophisticated integration of sensory, emotional, and cognitive processes, implemented through dynamic network interactions and expertise-dependent neural plasticity. Our framework emphasizes three key mechanisms underlying supercomplex experiences: predictive processing architectures that generate and update multi-level predictions, expertise-dependent network reorganization that enables enhanced sensory discrimination and conceptual integration, and dynamic network flexibility that supports adaptive processing of complex stimuli. While acknowledging debates between different theoretical approaches, we show how interoceptive predictions and embodied simulations, implemented through the anterior insula and related networks, provide a foundation for integrating bodily signals with external sensory input. The development of expertise in domains characterized by supercomplex experiences involves significant modifications of neural architecture, from local circuit refinement to large-scale network reorganization. This work extends beyond existing frameworks in cognitive neuroscience by providing a mechanistic account of how the brain processes and generates richly textured, multifaceted experiences that have previously been studied primarily through separate disciplinary lenses. The framework has implications for understanding expertise development, individual differences in complex skill acquisition, and the neural bases of sophisticated cognitive-perceptual capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.