ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Computational nanobody design through deep generative modeling and epitope landscape profiling.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reimagining computational macromolecular modeling: AI-driven approaches.Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- Isolation of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 through an epitope-guided negative screening by phage display.Journal of biomedical research · 2026Article
- Crystal structure and nanobodies against domain 3 of the malaria parasite fusogen Plasmodium falciparum HAP2.The Biochemical journal · 2026Article
- Nanobodies in biomedicine: from molecular characteristics to fabrication and clinical translation.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Targeting angiogenesis: advances in the design and engineered applications of nanobodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Phosphorylation of a Tumor-Derived ASXL2 Epitope Remodels the HLA-Bound Peptide Conformational Ensemble and Interaction Network of the Peptide-HLA Complex.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Computational refinement and multivalent engineering of complementarity-determining region-grafted nanobodies on a humanized scaffold for retaining antiviral efficacy.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanobodies, one-tenth the size of conventional antibodies, have gained attention as therapeutic agents for autoimmune diseases, cancer, and viral infections. However, traditional methods for nanobody discovery are often time-consuming and labor-intensive. In this study, we present a computational design framework that integrates deep generative modeling with epitope profiling. We first developed a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based model named AiCDR, which incorporates two external discriminators to enhance its ability to distinguish native CDR3 sequences from random sequences and peptides. This design enables the generator to produce CDR3 sequences with natural-like properties. Approximately 10,000 CDR3 sequences were generated and grafted onto a humanized scaffold. After structural prediction, we obtained a library of about 5200 high-confidence nanobody models. Using this structure-based library, we conducted epitope profiling across six representative protein targets. The nanobody-enriched epitopes showed strong overlap with known functional regions, suggesting potential biological activity. As a case study, we selected ten nanobodies designed to target the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron RBD. Two of these showed detectable neutralization activity in vitro. Overall, our results demonstrate that computational design and structure-based profiling offer an efficient strategy for early-stage therapeutic nanobody discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.