Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799894›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Placenta Previa Major: Prenatal Diagnosis and Uterus-Preserving Surgical Management in a Case Study From the Kingdom of Bahrain.

Reem Hasan, Nayla Bushaqer, Amala Sunder

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reem HasanGeneral Physician, Bahrain Defense Force Hospital, West Riffa, BHR.
Nayla BushaqerObstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Bahrain, Busaiteen, BHR.
Amala SunderObstetrics and Gynaecology, Bahrain Defense Force Hospital, West Riffa, BHR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placenta previa major is a significant concern in maternal healthcare due to its potential to cause postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), which can lead to morbidity and mortality following childbirth. PPH is generally defined as the loss of 500 ml or more of blood from the genital tract within 24 hours of the birth of a baby. PPH can result from various factors, including uterine atony, retained placental tissue, trauma, and placenta previa. Placenta previa, where the placenta is abnormally positioned over or near the cervical opening, is particularly concerning due to its significant risks for both maternal and fetal health. This case report focuses on placenta previa major as it represents one of the most severe complications in obstetrics, often leading to substantial bleeding that requires meticulous management to protect both the mother and the newborn. This case illustrates how prenatal imaging can guide the management of suspected placenta accreta. Despite suggestive imaging features, intraoperative findings confirmed placenta previa, emphasizing the need for surgical flexibility and appropriate use of hemostatic techniques.

Indexed as

b-lynch suturecesarean section (cs)intraoperative hemostasisplacenta accerta spectrumplacenta previaprenatal imaging

Identifiers

PMID40799894
PMCPMC12339422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.