ArticleCureus2025
Enhancing Breast Cancer Screening Uptake: A Community-based Intervention in Southeast Wolverhampton, UK.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Breast cancer screening rates in Wolverhampton, UK, have fallen below national targets. This study examines potential contributing factors to low screening uptake and evaluates whether collaboration between primary care networks (PCNs) and public health initiatives is associated with improved screening participation and health promotion efforts. The research focuses on Wolverhampton Southeast PCN, assessing the effectiveness of a joint approach in addressing health inequalities and enhancing targeted outreach. Setting and methods A targeted intervention was implemented to re-engage women who had previously missed breast cancer screening appointments. The intervention employed a multi-faceted strategy, incorporating high-quality telephone consultations and a self-booking system. The study involved two primary care practices in Wolverhampton - Bilston Urban Village and Bilston Medical Centre. Eligible participants were identified based on prior non-attendance, with 713 women included in the study. Results The intervention led to a 22% screening uptake (126 of the 581 invited participants) among 713 women who had previously not attended their breast screening appointments, demonstrating the potential of targeted strategies to improve participation. However, screening rates remain below the National Health Service (NHS) minimum target of 70%, indicating the need for further tailored interventions. Conclusion The findings underscore persistent disparities in breast cancer screening uptake within Wolverhampton's primary care network. While targeted interventions can enhance engagement, additional efforts are required to bridge the gap and achieve national screening targets. Strengthening collaboration between primary care and public health may be key to addressing health inequalities and improving preventive health measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.