ArticleCureus2025
Morphometric Analysis of the Maxillary Sinus and Its Implications for Sinus Augmentation Surgery in an Eastern Indian Population.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Morphometric analysis of maxillary air sinus: A cross sectional cadaveric study among North Indian population.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Sinus augmentation surgery, also called sinus graft or lift, involves elevating the Schneiderian membrane in the posterior maxilla to enhance alveolar bone height by placing a bone graft or osteogenic materials. This procedure is commonly performed to support dental implants. This study evaluates the morphometry of the maxillary sinus across different age groups within the Eastern Indian population and its implications for sinus augmentation surgery. Methods We analysed 85 patients (55 males (64.7%) and 30 females (35.3%)) who underwent computed tomography scans, assessing key parameters such as residual bone height, lateral wall thickness, medial wall thickness, and the sinus angle. Data were summarised and presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical data. Inferential tests were used to analyse the parameters, with a significance level of p<0.05. Results Our findings indicate that 56.47% (n=48) of patients had a residual bone height of ≤5 mm, necessitating sinus augmentation surgery before dental implantation. While lateral wall thickness was an important factor in selecting the appropriate surgical approach, with 16.67% (n=8) requiring the lateral window technique and 83.34% (n=40) better suited for the crestal approach, no significant gender differences were observed. However, the need for sinus augmentation surgery was more common in the 21-40 age group (p=0.008). Notably, left-side residual bone height was significantly lower than right-side residual bone height, indicating lateral asymmetry. Conclusion This study emphasizes the importance of maxillary sinus morphometry in optimizing sinus augmentation surgery techniques tailored to individual anatomical variations to improve surgical outcomes in the Eastern Indian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.