Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799847›Full record

ArticleAdvances in methods and practices in psychological science

Tutorial: Power analyses for interaction effects in cross-sectional regressions.

David A A Baranger, Megan C Finsaas, Brandon L Goldstein, Colin E Vize, Donald R Lynam, Thomas M Olino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in methods and practices in psychological science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Possible Sex Differences in the Morphological and Functional Muscle Quality Reflected by Phase Angle: Implications for Muscle Quality Assessment.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stimulated cytokine production, attachment, and emotional well-being in dementia spousal caregivers.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David A A BarangerDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis.
Megan C FinsaasDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University.
Brandon L GoldsteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut.
Colin E VizeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.
Donald R LynamDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University.
Thomas M OlinoDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAM IN PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGYT32MH013043 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Katherine M. Keyes · 1985 to 2026
$11.7M
CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING IN CHILD PSYCHIATRYT32MH018951 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TINA R GOLDSTEIN · 1990 to 2026
$9.7M
CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING FOR PSYCHOLOGISTST32MH018269 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MICHELE D LEVINE · 1986 to 2026
$6.3M
Developmental changes in reward responsivity: Associations with depression risk markersR01MH107495 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLINO, THOMAS M · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
7/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Advancing Discovery and ImpactR01DA054869 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AGRAWAL, ARPANA, EDENBERG, HOWARD J · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Modeling poly-genomic risk in the relationship between brain structure and alcohol involvement from adolescence through adulthoodR21AA027827 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BOGDAN, RYAN H · 2019 to 2020
$413k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA027827NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054869NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107495NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH013043NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018269NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaction analyses (also termed 'moderation' analyses or 'moderated multiple regression') are a form of linear regression analysis designed to test whether the association between two variables changes when conditioned on a third variable. It can be challenging to perform a power analysis for interactions with existing software, particularly when variables are correlated and continuous. Moreover, while power is impacted by main effects, their correlation, and variable reliability, it can be unclear how to incorporate these effects into a power analysis. The R package

Indexed as

Interactionsmoderationopen materialspower analysisR

Identifiers

PMID40799847
PMCPMC12341451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.