ArticleConservation physiology2025
Evolutionary ecophysiology in extreme environments under a global change scenario.
Article in Conservation physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As wildlife increasingly has to face levels of environmental conditions that go far beyond normal ranges, understanding the ecological and evolutionary dynamics behind such extreme scenarios becomes essential for animal conservation. Here, we discuss the eco-physiological singularities of wildlife coping with extreme conditions. We first discuss the conditions under which scenarios can be considered 'extreme'. This includes distinguishing the nature of natural and anthropogenic disturbances, considering aspects such as their intensities, as well as the understanding of species biology and evolutionary history. To exemplify the diversity of wildlife responses to extreme conditions, we highlight five different representative study cases (two with natural causes, three of anthropogenic origin): birds at high altitude, fish in geothermal habitats, birds in pesticide-laden farmlands, invertebrates in urban ponds, and amphibians in radioactive zones. These examples illustrate the diverse physiological and ecological responses to extreme factors, emphasizing the complexity of wildlife adaptation under different scenarios. However, they also reveal significant knowledge gaps regarding long-term effects of responses to extreme environments, and the mechanistic basis behind these processes. Future research should ideally include long-term approaches making use of validated physiological markers of individual, population or species health or fitness. This information could be then incorporated into mechanistic models like Species Distribution Models (SDMs) to predict species geographic occurrence and the impact of future extreme scenarios. Such holistic and integrative physiological approaches will enhance our understanding of species and population resilience, and will facilitate the identification of vulnerable populations, ultimately improving management strategies. By prioritizing these research efforts, we will better anticipate the impacts of environmental changes on wildlife health, and thus improve biodiversity conservation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.