ArticleDigital health
Smartphone accelerometer-measured physical activity and adiposity indicators among female university students.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Physical inactivity (PI) is a major contributing factor to obesity, which is an increasing public health concern. This study aimed to examine the relationship between objectively measured physical activity (PA) and body mass index (BMI) among female university students. Methods: A total of 600 female university students (mean age = 20.93 ± 1.12 years) participated in the study. Anthropometric measurements included weight, height, BMI, waist circumference, fat mass, muscle mass, and body fat percentage. Physical activity was assessed using smartphone-based accelerometers to measure step counts and calories burned. Results: BMI classifications showed that 8.33% of participants were morbidly obese, 25% overweight, and 19% obese. Significant differences were found between BMI, fat mass, and muscle mass with both step counts and calories expended. Approximately 39.33% of participants were categorized as physically active, while the remaining 60.67% were inactive. Inactive students had higher fat accumulation and significantly fewer daily steps ( Conclusion: The findings reveal a high prevalence of obesity and PI among Saudi female university students. Active students had significantly lower BMI, waist circumference, fat mass, and body fat percentage than their inactive counterparts. Obese students were less active, had fewer steps, lower muscle mass, and reduced specific muscle strength. These findings underscore the urgent need for preventive health policies targeting overweight and obese female students in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.