ArticleMethodsX2025
Visual and motor skills development in preterm and full-term infants: A protocol for longitudinal data collection.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preterm birth, defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation, affects approximately one in ten live-born infants globally. The risks and potential complications are more pronounced in infants born before 32 weeks, particularly those born before 28 weeks, necessitating specialized monitoring of developmental outcomes. Traditional developmental assessments often rely on performance-based observations, which can be subjective, and may not detect subtle or delayed difficulties that emerge later, such as in school-age children. This study presents the development and pilot application of a comprehensive protocol designed for the objective and integrated collection of clinical, developmental, and electrophysiological data to evaluate the impact of preterm birth. The protocol involves monitoring two groups of healthy infants-preterm and full-term-at four time points during the first year (4, 6, 9, and 12 months). Assessments include clinical evaluations, the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, and electrophysiological recordings such as visual evoked potentials (VEP), electrodermal activity (EDA), and an ophthalmological screening assessment at 4 months. Two case examples (one full-term, one preterm) are provided to illustrate data collection and application. While the article does not include outcome analysis, it emphasizes protocol structure and applicability, offering a foundation for future longitudinal study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.