Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799815›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Timing is everything: How subtle timing changes in MRI echo planar imaging can significantly alter mechanical vibrations and sound level.

Amir Seginer, Alexander Bratch, Shahar Goren, Edna Furman-Haran, Noam Harel, Essa Yacoub, Rita Schmidt

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amir SeginerLife Sciences Core Facilities, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel.
Alexander BratchCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA.
Shahar GorenThe Azrieli National Institute for Human Brain Imaging and Research, Weizmann Institute of Science.
Edna Furman-HaranLife Sciences Core Facilities, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel.
Noam HarelCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA.
Essa YacoubCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA.
Rita SchmidtThe Azrieli National Institute for Human Brain Imaging and Research, Weizmann Institute of Science.

Funding

TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
Laminar Circuit Motifs for Working Memory and Language Combinatorics: From Cells to SystemsU01NS137991 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jeremy Greenlee, Christopher I Petkov · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS137991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern MRI relies on the well-established Echo-Planar-Imaging (EPI) method for fast acquisition. EPI is the workhorse of diffusion and functional MRI in neuroscience as well as of many dynamic applications for clinical body imaging. Its speed stems from rapidly switching currents through the 'gradient coils' responsible for spatial encoding. These quick changes, within a strong static magnetic field induce Lorentz forces that generate mechanical vibrations, leading to the loud, characteristic MRI noise. This acoustic noise is already a significant concern in standard clinical scanners, requiring hearing protection and risking image degradation or even hardware strain. In ultra-high-field systems (≥7T), the issue is exacerbated due to stronger Lorentz forces. In this study, we introduce a novel model that characterizes the acoustic spectrum for a given EPI scan. The spectrum results from interference between multiple identical periods of alternating currents, making the relative timing between them a key factor. We show that even subtle timing changes significantly alter the sound level. Scans of either high spatial resolution or high temporal resolution, on clinical 7T and investigational 10.5T human scanners, corroborated the model and its predicted acoustics spectra. Acoustic energy changes of up to 47-fold were reached in close to mechanical resonances and up to 5-fold in other regions. Intriguingly, under certain conditions, doubling the acquisitions per unit time actually reduced the minimal acoustic energy two-fold. Not less important, 'ghosting-artifacts' exhibit strong dependence on the scan's acoustic characteristics and the benefit of subtle time delays of internal correction-acquisitions ('navigators') is also demonstrated.

Identifiers

PMID40799815
PMCPMC12340897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.