ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Clinical Microbiology in Xylazine-Associated Wound Infections.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Injection drug use (IDU) containing xylazine has been associated with the development of chronic necrotic wounds, albeit not all are of infectious etiology. This study describes the clinical microbiology of xylazine-associated wound infections to guide antimicrobial prescribing. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study of adults hospitalized with xylazine-associated wound infections related to IDU from 1 April 2022 to 1 December 2023. Patients were included if they received antimicrobials for suspected wound infections, along with either a positive urine xylazine test or urine fentanyl test with patient-reported xylazine use. Microbiology results of wound and blood cultures were collected. Antimicrobial spectrum and hospital outcomes were described, including multidrug-resistant organisms' isolation, duration of therapy, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission. Results: A total of 166 patients were included, of whom 81 had wound cultures and 153 had blood cultures collected; more than half had positive cultures (93/166 [56.0%]). Most wound cultures were positive (78/81 [96.3%]), compared to 25.5% of blood cultures (39/153). Approximately 40% of wound cultures were obtained operatively. Gram-positive organisms were isolated in nearly all wound (73/78 [93.6%]) and blood (37/39 [94.9%]) cultures. The predominant causative organisms were methicillin-resistant Conclusions: Empiric antimicrobial coverage for suspected xylazine-associated wound infections should include MRSA and β-hemolytic streptococci coverage. Empiric gram-negative and anaerobic coverage may be warranted for those with higher suspicion of bone and joint involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.