ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Perspectives in Brain Abscess Diagnosis and Management: A National Survey of Infectious Disease Specialists.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Otogenic Sigmoid Sinus Thrombosis Complicated by Cerebellar Abscess and Hydrocephalus: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Insertion of a Postoperative Drain After Surgeries for Intracranial Abscesses or Empyemas-A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Review
- Streptococcus anginosus group brain abscesses and subdural empyemas: exploratory compartment-specific phenotypes and discharge outcomes in a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Feasibility of short-course antibiotic therapy for surgically treated brain abscess guided by 4-week MRI.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Variability in causative agents, host factors, and management complexity and the lack of clear guidelines in the United States hinder the standardization of brain abscess (BA) care. This survey examines US infectious disease (ID) specialists' perspectives on BA care, comparing practice settings and identifying key areas for future studies and guideline development. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of neurologists and ID physicians developed a 10-item online survey that was validated via a focus group and distributed to 1486 ID specialists in the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Emerging Infections Network from 7 September to 2 October 2023. Results: Of the 551 respondents (37% response rate), 116 (21%) opted out due to noninvolvement in BA cases, leaving 435 completed surveys. The most common empiric treatment (53%) consisted of third-generation cephalosporin, metronidazole, and vancomycin. Imaging at treatment completion was supported by 67%, and 75% recommended a 6- to 8-week intravenous antibiotic course. Neurosurgical intervention was primarily pursued to identify pathogens and confirm the diagnosis. Molecular diagnostics were variably used, with broad-spectrum polymerase chain reaction being the most commonly utilized test. Transitioning to oral antibiotics before 6 weeks was favored by 40%, while only 18% recommended postintravenous oral consolidation therapy. Notably, 91% endorsed the need for BA management guidelines. Conclusions: This study highlights a lack of consensus and significant variations in BA management, suggesting that current practices rely heavily on expert opinion rather than standardized protocols. These findings emphasize the need for further studies and US-specific guidelines to complement efforts of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and establish a more comprehensive, globally applicable standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.