Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799790›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Perspectives in Brain Abscess Diagnosis and Management: A National Survey of Infectious Disease Specialists.

Ralph Habis, Melissa Canales, Susan E Beekmann, Philip M Polgreen, Kiran T Thakur, Juan Gea-Banacloche, Allan R Tunkel, Jacob Bodilsen, Arun Venkatesan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ralph HabisJohns Hopkins Encephalitis Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5817-6485
Melissa CanalesJohns Hopkins Encephalitis Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3767-7675
Susan E BeekmannCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Philip M PolgreenCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Kiran T ThakurDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Juan Gea-BanaclocheNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Allan R TunkelDepartment of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Jacob BodilsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-814X
Arun VenkatesanJohns Hopkins Encephalitis Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9335-7361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Variability in causative agents, host factors, and management complexity and the lack of clear guidelines in the United States hinder the standardization of brain abscess (BA) care. This survey examines US infectious disease (ID) specialists' perspectives on BA care, comparing practice settings and identifying key areas for future studies and guideline development. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of neurologists and ID physicians developed a 10-item online survey that was validated via a focus group and distributed to 1486 ID specialists in the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Emerging Infections Network from 7 September to 2 October 2023. Results: Of the 551 respondents (37% response rate), 116 (21%) opted out due to noninvolvement in BA cases, leaving 435 completed surveys. The most common empiric treatment (53%) consisted of third-generation cephalosporin, metronidazole, and vancomycin. Imaging at treatment completion was supported by 67%, and 75% recommended a 6- to 8-week intravenous antibiotic course. Neurosurgical intervention was primarily pursued to identify pathogens and confirm the diagnosis. Molecular diagnostics were variably used, with broad-spectrum polymerase chain reaction being the most commonly utilized test. Transitioning to oral antibiotics before 6 weeks was favored by 40%, while only 18% recommended postintravenous oral consolidation therapy. Notably, 91% endorsed the need for BA management guidelines. Conclusions: This study highlights a lack of consensus and significant variations in BA management, suggesting that current practices rely heavily on expert opinion rather than standardized protocols. These findings emphasize the need for further studies and US-specific guidelines to complement efforts of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and establish a more comprehensive, globally applicable standard of care.

Indexed as

antibacterial agentsbrain abscessdiagnostic modalitiesneurosurgical interventionpractice patterns

Identifiers

PMID40799790
PMCPMC12341925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.