ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2025
Leveraging User-Centered Design and Usability and Skills Testing for a Novel Diabetes Survival Skills Toolkit.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Content Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Diabetes Self-Management Support Tool for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Leveraging User-Centered Design and Usability and Skills Testing for a Novel Diabetes Survival Skills Toolkit.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: With the expansion of telemedicine, patient-centered approaches for delivering diabetes mellitus (DM) self-care education in both in-person and remote settings are needed. A novel Diabetes Survival Skills Toolkit (Kit) (physical toolkit, website, paper guide) was developed, using a user-centered design approach. The aim of this study was to develop a hybrid protocol to assess the perceived usability of the Kit and the skills attainment of its users. Methods: Adults without prior exposure to DM self-care were recruited. User tests were conducted between January 2021 and July 2022. Initially, the usability of the website alone was tested. Then, usability and skills attainment tests were conducted with all 3 components delivered together. Usability was measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS) and skills attainment was measured thorough simulated insulin injection and lancing device use. Results: User tests (N = 43) were conducted remotely (27/43; 63%) and in-person (16/43; 37%). SUS scores were largely excellent (35%) or acceptable (47%). Users who completed skills attainment testing (N = 32) all successfully injected insulin with simulation supplies. However, SUS scores and skills attainment were poorly correlated: users with unacceptable SUS scores (4/32, 13%) successfully attained the tested skills, while 2 of the 3 users who did not demonstrate successful lancing device use had excellent SUS scores. Conclusion: Hybrid user testing of a multi-component Kit to teach DM survival skills showed high skills attainment among adult users new to DM self-care. Pairing usability and skills attainment testing can help optimize the design of DM education interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.