Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799736›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Esophageal Cancer Staging in Malawi: The Feasibility of Chest Radiography and Abdominal Ultrasound for Initial Evaluation.

Brittney M Williams, Gift Mulima, Bongani Kaimila, Katherine Drew Marapese, Ande W Salima, Austin Evans, Natasha Ngwira, Chifundo Kajombo, Jared Gallaher, Anthony Charles and 3 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brittney M WilliamsEmory University.
Gift MulimaKamuzu Central Hospital.
Bongani KaimilaKamuzu Central Hospital.
Katherine Drew MarapeseUniversity of North Carolina.
Ande W SalimaKamuzu Central Hospital.
Austin EvansUniversity of North Carolina.
Natasha NgwiraKamuzu Central Hospital.
Chifundo KajomboKamuzu Central Hospital.
Jared GallaherUniversity of North Carolina.
Anthony CharlesUniversity of Vermont.
Katrina McGintyNovant Health.
Geoffrey BuckleUniversity of California San Francisco (UCSF).
Gita N ModyUniversity of North Carolina.

Funding

UJMT – ORWH – Gazzetta, Issa-BoubeD43TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI William Checkley, Benjamin H. Chi · 2017 to 2026
$14.8M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in Malawi. Given limited imaging capacity and high costs, staging is not routinely performed. One proposed staging algorithm is to first evaluate for metastatic disease using low-cost chest radiography (CXR) and abdominal ultrasound (US) followed by confirmatory computerized tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen if no metastases identified on initial screening. The feasibility of this approach is unknown for EC in sub-Saharan Africa and was studied in the context of a larger prospective observational cohort study of EC in Malawi. Methods: From 2021 to 2022, EC patients at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi enrolled in the Treatment Outcomes of Esophageal Cancer in Malawi (TOEC-M) study were recruited. Participants were scheduled for a CXR, US, and CT scan as part of this sub-study. Participant characteristics, completion rates, imaging findings, and barriers to completion were documented. For participants undergoing all three imaging studies, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results: Of 150 patients in TOEC-M, 67 (44.7%) enrolled in this sub-study. Mean age was 55.4 years and 50.8% were males. The majority had mid-esophageal (38 [56.7%]) squamous cell carcinomas (54 [80.6%]). CXR was completed in 54 (80.6%) study participants, US in 43 (64.2%), CT chest in 29 (43.3%), and CT abdomen in 24 (35.8%). Sixteen (23.9%) completed all studies and 4 (6.0%) did not undergo any imaging. Of the 63 patients that were imaged, metastatic disease was identified in 18 (28.6%) by any modality. Positive findings were identified on 3 (5.6%) CXRs, 4 (9.3%) US, and 18 (62.1%) CTs, most frequently liver masses followed by lung nodules and adenopathy. Barriers to imaging completion included participant functional status and scanner availability. Conclusions: As access to EC treatment modalities expands, feasible and accurate staging will become increasingly important to guide clinical management. Our results suggest that CXR and US may serve as useful initial tools for assessing metastatic disease. In patients not medically fit for oncologic treatment, positive findings on CXR and US may allow CT to be deferred. Barriers to implementation of a pragmatic stepwise staging algorithm identified in this study can inform future research and care for patients with EC in similar resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Esophageal cancerlow- and middle-income countriesstaging

Identifiers

PMID40799736
PMCPMC12340917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.