ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023
High sensitivity mapping of brain-wide functional networks in awake mice using simultaneous multi-slice fUS imaging.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Awake Mouse Brain Imaging Using Functional Ultrasound and Functional Ultrasound Localization Microscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Orbitofrontal PV interneurons modulate social interaction via default mode network dynamics.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Computational design of foldable origami-based compressive ultrasound sensing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Electroacupuncture Prevents Against AD-Like Phenotypes in APP/PS1 Mice: Investigation of the Mechanisms From Cerebral Microangiopathy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Functional ultrasound as a quantitative approach for measuring functional hyperemia in aging models.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Robust single-trial decoding of physical self-motion from hemodynamic signals in the brain measured by functional ultrasound imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Transcranial brain-wide functional ultrasound and ultrasound localization microscopy in mice using multi-array probes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Monitoring microvascular changes over time with a repositionable 3D ultrasonic capacitive micromachined row-column sensor.Science advances · 2025Article
- Physio-fUS: a tissue-motion based method for heart and breathing rate assessment in neurofunctional ultrasound imaging.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Emerging Wearable Acoustic Sensing Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Charting the path in rodent functional neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Functional ultrasound (fUS) detects mild cerebral alterations using canonical correlation analysis denoising and dynamic functional connectivity analysis.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Non-invasive 4D transcranial functional ultrasound and ultrasound localization microscopy for multimodal imaging of neurovascular response.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The COMBO window: A chronic cranial implant for multiscale circuit interrogation in mice.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: A systematic framework for motion artifact removal.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional ultrasound (fUS) has received growing attention in preclinical research in the past decade, providing a new tool to measure functional connectivity (FC) and brain task-evoked responses with single-trial detection capability in both anesthetized and awake conditions. Most fUS studies rely on 2D linear arrays to acquire one slice of the brain. Volumetric fUS using 2D matrix or row-column arrays has recently been demonstrated in rats and mice but requires invasive craniotomy to expose the brain due to a lack of sensitivity. In a previous study, we proposed the use of motorized linear arrays, allowing imaging through the skull in mice for multiple slices with high sensitivity. However, the tradeoff between the field of view and temporal resolution introduced by motorized scanning prevents acquiring brain-wide resting-state FC data with a sufficient volume rate for resting-state FC analysis. Here, we propose a new hybrid solution optimized and dedicated to brain-wide transcranial FC studies in mice, based on a newly developed multi-array transducer allowing simultaneous multi-slicing of the entire mouse cerebrum. We first demonstrate that our approach provides a better imaging quality compared to other existing methods. Then, we show the ability to image the whole mouse brain non-invasively through the intact skin and skull during visual stimulation under light anesthesia to validate this new approach. Significant activation was detected along the whole visual pathway, at both single and group levels, with more than 10% of augmentation of the cerebral blood volume (CBV) signal during the visual stimulation compared to baseline. Finally, we assessed resting-state FC in awake head-fixed animals. Several robust and long-ranged FC patterns were identified in both cortical and sub-cortical brain areas, corresponding to functional networks already described in previous fMRI studies. Together, these results show that the multi-array probe is a valuable approach to measure brain-wide hemodynamic activity in mice with an intact skull. Most importantly, its ability to identify robust resting-state networks is paving the way towards a better understanding of the mouse brain functional organization and its breakdown in genetic models of neuropsychiatric diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.