Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799720›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023

The cerebellum during provocation and aggressive behaviour: A 7 T fMRI study.

Elze M L Wolfs, Wietske Van der Zwaag, Nikos Priovoulos, Jana Klaus, Dennis J L G Schutter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cerebellar imaging for neuroscience at 9.4 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elze M L WolfsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wietske Van der ZwaagSpinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nikos PriovoulosSpinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jana KlausDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dennis J L G SchutterDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing empirical evidence points towards the involvement of the cerebellum in anger and aggressive behaviour. However, human functional neuroimaging studies so far have emphasised the involvement of subcortical and cortical regions, rather than examining the contributions of the cerebellum. In the present study, 7 T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to assess cerebellar activation during provocation and aggressive behaviour elicited by the Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm in 29 healthy adult volunteers. Provocations resulted in left posterior cerebellar activation, while right posterior cerebellar activation was associated with aggressive behaviour. Our findings confirm the involvement of distinct and lateralised non-motor related cerebellar areas during provocation and aggressive behaviour. This study adds to the growing recognition of the posterior cerebellar regions in emotion- and cognition-dedicated processes and to the role of the little brain in human aggression.

Indexed as

angercerebellumcorticosteroid hormonesfunctional magnetic resonance imagingprovocationultra-high field fMRI

Identifiers

PMID40799720
PMCPMC12007546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.