Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799717›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023

Directional sensitivity of cortical neurons towards TMS-induced electric fields.

Konstantin Weise, Torge Worbs, Benjamin Kalloch, Victor H Souza, Aurélien Tristan Jaquier, Werner Van Geit, Axel Thielscher, Thomas R Knösche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Variable E-field properties of dual-site tACS with phase lags.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multi-coil TMS for preclinical applications in ultra-high-field MRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuromodulatory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) changes functional connectivity proportional to the electric-field induced by the TMS pulse.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Electric-field-based dosing for TMS.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Konstantin WeiseMethods and Development Group "Brain Networks", Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Torge WorbsMethods and Development Group "Brain Networks", Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Benjamin KallochMethods and Development Group "Brain Networks", Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Victor H SouzaDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Aurélien Tristan JaquierBlue Brain Project, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
Werner Van GeitBlue Brain Project, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
Axel ThielscherMagnetic Resonance Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Thomas R KnöscheMethods and Development Group "Brain Networks", Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We derived computationally efficient average response models of different types of cortical neurons, which are subject to external electric fields from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. We used 24 reconstructions of pyramidal cells (PC) from layer 2/3, 245 small, nested, and large basket cells from layer 4, and 30 PC from layer 5 with different morphologies for deriving average models. With these models, it is possible to efficiently estimate the stimulation thresholds depending on the underlying electric field distribution in the brain, without having to implement and compute complex neuron compartment models. The stimulation thresholds were determined by exposing the neurons to TMS-induced electric fields with different angles, intensities, pulse waveforms, and field decays along the somato-dendritic axis. The derived average response models were verified by reference simulations using a high-resolution realistic head model containing several million neurons. The relative errors of the estimated thresholds between the average model and the reference model ranged between -3% and 3.7% in 98% of the cases, while the computation time was only a fraction of a second compared to several weeks. Finally, we compared the model behavior to TMS experiments and observed high correspondence to the orientation sensitivity of motor evoked potentials. The derived models were compared to the classical cortical column cosine model and to simplified ball-and-stick neurons. It was shown that both models oversimplify the complex interplay between the electric field and the neurons and do not adequately represent the directional sensitivity of the different cell types. The derived models are simple to apply and only require the TMS-induced electric field in the brain as input variable. The models and code are available to the general public in open-source repositories for integration into TMS studies to estimate the expected stimulation thresholds for an improved dosing and treatment planning in the future.

Indexed as

directional sensitivityelectric field couplingneurontranscranial magnetic stimulationuncertainty analysis

Identifiers

PMID40799717
PMCPMC12007551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.