ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023
Initial experiences with Direct Imaging of Neuronal Activity (DIANA) in humans.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suppression of Oscillation and Ghosting in RF-Spoiled Gradient-Echo-Based Dynamic Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Using PINS pulses to saturate inflow effects on fMRI data at 3 and 7 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Stimulus-induced rotary saturation imaging of visually evoked response: A pilot study.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Functional conductivity imaging: quantitative mapping of brain activity.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- No replication of direct neuronal activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in anesthetized mice.Science advances · 2024Article
- A different interpretation of the DIANA fMRI signal.Science advances · 2024Article
- Limitations of 2-dimensional line-scan MRI for directly measuring neural activity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Alpha-180 spin-echo-based line-scanning method for high-resolution laminar-specific fMRI in animals.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- No observation of DIANA signals in rats at 7.0 and 17.2 Tesla.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Updated Perspectives on the Neurobiology of Substance Use Disorders Using Neuroimaging.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) has been widely used to study activity patterns in the human brain. It infers neuronal activity from the associated hemodynamic response, which fundamentally limits its spatiotemporal specificity. In mice, the Direct Imaging of Neuronal Activity (DIANA) method revealed MRI signals that correlated with extracellular electric activity, showing high spatiotemporal specificity. In this work, we attempted DIANA in humans. Five experimental paradigms were tested, exploring different stimulus types (flickering noise patterns, and naturalistic images), stimulus durations (50-200 ms), and imaging resolution (2 × 2 × 5 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.