ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023
Neural representations of naturalistic person identities while watching a feature film.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A view-engage-predict framework for enhancing brain-behavior mapping with naturalistic movie-watching fMRI.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Conceptual Knowledge Shapes the Neural Representations of Learned Faces in Non-Visual Regions of the Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Representations of personally familiar voices are better resolved in the brain.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Personally valued voices engage reward-motivated behaviour and brain responses.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recognising other people in naturalistic settings relies on differentiating between individuals ("telling apart"), as well as generalising across within-person variability ("telling together"; Burton, 2013; Lavan, Burston, & Garrido, 2019; Lavan, Burton, et al., 2019). However, previous neuroscientific investigations of face and voice recognition have tended to measure identity-related responses and representations using tightly controlled stimuli, thus under sampling the naturalistic variability encountered in everyday life. In this study, we tested whether cortical regions previously implicated in processing faces and voices represent identities during naturalistic and task-free stimulation. Representational similarity analyses were conducted on functional MRI datasets collected while human participants watched feature-length movies. Identity representations-defined as similar response patterns to variable instances of the same person ("telling together"), and dissimilar patterns in response to different people ("telling apart")-were observed in established face and voice processing areas, across two independent participant groups viewing different sets of identities. We also explored contributions of face versus voice information to identity representations, finding more widespread preferential sensitivity to faces. We thus characterise how the brain represents identities in the real world, for the first-time accounting for both "telling people together" and "telling people apart." Despite substantial differences to previous experimental research, our findings align with previous work, showing that similar brain areas are engaged in the representation of identities under experimental and naturalistic exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.