Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799699›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023

Test-retest reliability of the human connectome: An OPM-MEG study.

Lukas Rier, Sebastian Michelmann, Harrison Ritz, Vishal Shah, Ryan M Hill, James Osborne, Cody Doyle, Niall Holmes, Richard Bowtell, Matthew J Brookes and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Test-retest reliability of the human connectome: An OPM-MEG study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lukas RierSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sebastian MichelmannPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Harrison RitzPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Vishal ShahQuSpin Inc., Louisville, CO, United States.
Ryan M HillSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
James OsborneQuSpin Inc., Louisville, CO, United States.
Cody DoyleQuSpin Inc., Louisville, CO, United States.
Niall HolmesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Richard BowtellSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Matthew J BrookesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Kenneth A NormanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Uri HassonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Jonathan D CohenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.
Elena BotoSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

High-resolution Non-cryogenic Magnetoencephalography: Systems-Level IntegrationR44MH110288 · NIMH · QUSPIN · PI SHAH, VISHAL K · 2016 to 2022
$5.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH110288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography with optically pumped magnetometers (OPM-MEG) offers a new way to record electrophysiological brain function, with significant advantages over conventional MEG, including adaptability to head shape/size, free movement during scanning, increased signal amplitude, and no reliance on cryogenics. However, OPM-MEG remains in its infancy, with significant questions to be answered regarding the optimal system design. Here, we present an open-source dataset acquired using a newly constructed OPM-MEG system with a triaxial sensor design, 168 channels, OPM-optimised magnetic shielding, and active background field control. We measure the test-retest reliability of the human connectome, which was computed using amplitude envelope correlation to measure whole-brain (parcellated) functional connectivity, in 10 individuals while they watch a 600 s move clip. Our results show high repeatability between experimental runs at the group level, with a correlation coefficient of 0.81 in the θ, 0.93 in

Indexed as

functional connectivitymagnetoencephalographyOPM-MEGoptically pumped magnetometersreliability

Identifiers

PMID40799699
PMCPMC12007552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.