Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799696›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023

Erotic cue exposure increases neural reward responses without modulating temporal discounting.

Kilian Knauth, David Mathar, Bojana Kuzmanovic, Marc Tittgemeyer, Jan Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kilian KnauthDepartment of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of Cologne, Germany.
David MatharDepartment of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Bojana KuzmanovicTranslational Neurocircuitry Group, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Marc TittgemeyerTranslational Neurocircuitry Group, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jan PetersDepartment of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans prefer smaller sooner over larger later rewards, a tendency denoted as temporal discounting. Discounting of future rewards is increased in multiple maladaptive behaviors and clinical conditions. Although temporal discounting is stable over time, it is partly under contextual control. Appetitive (erotic) cues might increase preferences for immediate rewards, although evidence to date remains mixed. Reward circuit activity was hypothesized to drive increases in temporal discounting following cue exposure, yet this was never tested directly. We examined erotic vs. neutral cue exposure effects on subsequent temporal discounting in a preregistered within-subjects study in healthy male participants (n = 38). Functional magnetic resonance imaging assessed neural cue-reactivity, value-computations, and choice-related effects. We replicated previous findings of value-coding in ventromedial prefrontal cortices, striatum, and cingulate cortex. Likewise, as hypothesized, lateral prefrontal cortex activity increased during delayed reward choices, potentially reflecting cognitive control. Erotic cue exposure was associated with increased activity in attention and reward circuits. Contrary to preregistered hypotheses, temporal discounting was unaffected by cue exposure, and cue responses in reward circuits did not reliably predict changes in behavior. Our results raise doubts on the hypothesis that upregulation of (dopaminergic) reward systems following erotic cue exposure is sufficient to drive myopic approach behavior towards immediate rewards.

Indexed as

appetitive cue effectschoice impulsivitymodel-based fMRItemporal discounting

Identifiers

PMID40799696
PMCPMC12007530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.