ArticleTranslational animal science2025
Improved genomic prediction accuracy by genetic relatedness using a crossbred pig population.
Article in Translational animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic prediction is crucial in animal breeding because it facilitates the selection of superior individuals based on genotype data. The success of genomic prediction is determined by its accuracy, which depends on the size of the reference population and relatedness between the reference and test populations. However, not all populations have large, highly genetically related reference populations. In this study, we evaluated the genomic prediction accuracy of three crossbreds and seven purebred populations using crossbred animals as a reference population and determined whether crossbred could be used as a reference population for small purebred populations. Genomic prediction accuracy was assessed using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) for backfat thickness and carcass weight traits. Data from 29 Bisaro, 91 Duroc, 50 Duroc × Korean Native Pig (DK), 36 Iberian, 34 Korean Native Pig (KNP), 85 Landrace, 50 Landrace × Korean Native Pig (LK), 50 Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc (LYD), 37 Meishan, and 49 Yorkshire pigs were used as test populations, whereas data from 245 DK, 964 LK, and 967 LYD crossbreds were used as the reference population. The findings indicated that the prediction accuracy of purebreds was higher when they were genetically related to the crossbred population, with accuracies ranging from 0.36 to 0.53 for backfat thickness and from 0.26 to 0.46 for carcass weight. In contrast, unrelated breeds showed lower accuracies, ranging from 0.16 to 0.48 for backfat thickness and from 0.13 to 0.40 for carcass weight. These results suggest that using crossbred populations related to the purebred population being predicted can improve prediction accuracy, especially for breeds with limited data. The prediction accuracy increased as the size of the reference population increased, regardless of genetic relatedness. Notably, small reference populations yielded higher accuracy when they were genetically related to the target animals, underscoring the importance of genetic similarity in addition to population size. These results highlight that using crossbred animals for reference populations is advantageous for genomic predictions because large populations can be rapidly established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.