ArticleBrain & spine2025
Can the supine extended position with legs straightened and a lumbar pillow complement the psoas-relaxed position for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI? A prospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: When the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis is uncertain in the conventional psoas-relaxed position (PRP) MRI, upright MRI is a not widely available alternative. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a modified supine MRI position with legs straight and an adjustable pillow under the lumbar spine (EXT) could mimic the effect of standing. Research question: We hypothesized that EXT would mimic upright MRI in stenosis severity. Materials and methods: Forty patients (58 % male, mean age 57 years) underwent a 3T (65 %) or 1.5T MRI. For the levels L2-S1, central stenosis (Lee: 0-3), dural cross sectional area (DCSA: mm Results: At L4/L5 EXT showed increased narrowing in 40 % (central), 37.5 % (lateral), and 17.5 % (foraminal). DCSA decreased (P < 0.0001) and LA increased (P < 0.0001), with strong correlations and high reliability (P < 0.0001). Lateral recess stenosis increased significantly in EXT at L4/L5 (P = 0.014; K = 0.646). No significant difference was observed in foraminal stenosis (K = 0.488). Discussion and conclusion: EXT increased lumbar lordosis to the normal standing range of approximately 50°, mimicking an upright MRI. A more realistic degree of central stenosis at all levels and of lateral recess stenosis at L4/L5 was shown. Foraminal stenosis did not increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.