ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Unique unbiased median solution for even sample sizes.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data in experimental biology are frequently marred by outliers and asymmetric distributions. The median, being a robust estimator of central tendency, is less sensitive to outliers than the mean. However, for ranked datasets with an even number of observations, the conventional median-calculated as the average of the two middle values-can introduce bias by implicitly assuming symmetry in the data distribution. This study aims to identify a median estimator that is unbiased. To derive the unbiased median estimator, we minimized the sum of residuals raised to a rational power approaching one. We compared the properties of the unbiased and conventional medians using Poisson-distributed datasets. Random samples were generated with the Mersenne Twister algorithm implemented in IgorPro software (WaveMetrics Inc., Oregon). For odd sample sizes, the unbiased median coincides with the conventional median (the middle value). For even sample sizes, the unbiased median is defined as the value that equalizes the product of distances to data points above and below it-a definition that differs from the conventional median in asymmetric distributions. Although both median estimators tend to underestimate the mean of Poisson-distributed data, the unbiased median is consistently closer to the expected value. Additionally, the unbiased median exhibits lower variance compared to the conventional median. Thus, for even sample sizes, the proposed unbiased median provides a central tendency measure that is unbiased, more accurate, and has reduced variance relative to the conventional median.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.