ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Modeling differences in neurodevelopmental maturity of the reading network using support vector regression on functional connectivity data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The construction of growth charts trained to predict age or developmental deviation (the 'brain-age index') based on structural/functional properties of the brain may be informative of children's neurodevelopmental trajectories. When applied to both typically and atypically developing populations, results may indicate that a particular condition is associated with atypical maturation of certain brain networks. Here, we focus on the relationship between reading disorder (RD) and maturation of functional connectivity (FC) patterns in the prototypical reading/language network using a cross-sectional sample of N = 742 participants aged 6-21 years. A support vector regression model is trained to predict chronological age from FC data derived from a whole-brain model as well as multiple 'reduced' models, which are trained on FC data generated from a successively smaller number of regions in the brain's reading network. We hypothesized that the trained models would show systematic underestimation of brain network maturity for poor readers, particularly for the models trained with reading/language regions. Comparisons of the different models' predictions revealed that while the whole-brain model outperforms the others in terms of overall prediction accuracy, all models successfully predicted brain maturity, including the one trained with the smallest amount of FC data. In addition, all models showed that reading ability affected the 'brain-age' gap, with poor readers' ages being underestimated and advanced readers' ages being overestimated. Exploratory results demonstrated that the most important regions and connections for prediction were derived from the default mode and frontoparietal control networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.