ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
An Optimization Framework for the Design of Radiofrequency Coils for Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The radiative characteristics of the radiofrequency receive coils dictate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of magnetic resonance images. Despite the crucial importance of RF coils, the practical coil design process has remained a largely empirical one. This work introduces a novel optimization framework for rational coil design, which relies on a fully automated pipeline that combines rapid electromagnetic simulations, shape optimization and coil meshing. The objective function iteratively maximizes SNR performance in a target region of interest with respect to the ultimate intrinsic SNR, which is the theoretically highest SNR independent from any particular coil design. The forward simulation employs a fast electromagnetic solver based on coupled surface and volume integral equations. The coils are represented as B-spline curves with an associated width, and automatically meshed for EM simulation. We implemented a new method to tune and decouple coils at each iteration without manual user intervention. The algorithm optimizes the size and position of a given number of coils with a combination of grid search and a line search. We demonstrated the framework by designing receive arrays of increasing complexity that yield optimal SNR for different target regions inside a numerical head model. SNR simulation time ranged from 15 s for a 3-coil configuration to 32 s for a 12-coil array, constrained to a helmet-like surface, including tuning and decoupling. The optimized 12-coil geometry yielded 9% higher average SNR performance in the brain at 3 T. This work represents the first automated coil optimization framework that uses full-wave electromagnetic simulations and ultimate performance benchmarks. This novel approach enables the systematic design of coils for magnetic resonance imaging with significantly improved SNR performance, potentially transforming coil development from empirical design to physics-driven optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.