ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Estimating protein complex model accuracy using graph transformers and pairwise similarity graphs.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ORIGAMI: Orientation-Aware Graph Neural Network for Assessing Multimeric Interfaces of Protein Complex Structures.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- ORIGAMI: Orientation-Aware Graph Neural Network for Assessing Multimeric Interfaces of Protein Complex Structures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Improving AlphaFold2- and AlphaFold3-Based Protein Complex Structure Prediction With MULTICOM4 in CASP16.Proteins · 2026Article
- Highlights of Model Quality Assessment in CASP16.Proteins · 2026Article
- Boosting AlphaFold protein tertiary structure prediction through MSA engineering and extensive model sampling and ranking in CASP16.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Estimation of protein complex structure accuracy is essential for effective structural model selection in structural biology applications such as protein function analysis and drug design. Despite the success of structure prediction methods such as AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3, selecting top-quality structural models from large model pools remains challenging. Results: We present GATE, a novel method that uses graph transformers on pairwise model similarity graphs to predict the quality (accuracy) of complex structural models. By integrating single-model and multimodel quality features, GATE captures intrinsic model characteristics and intermodel geometric similarities to make robust predictions. On the dataset of the 15th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP15), GATE achieved the highest Pearson's correlation (0.748) and the lowest ranking loss (0.1191) compared with existing methods. In the blind CASP16 experiment, GATE ranked fifth based on the sum of z-scores, with a Pearson's correlation of 0.7076 (first), a Spearman's correlation of 0.4514 (fourth), a ranking loss of 0.1221 (third), and an area under the curve score of 0.6680 (third) on per-target TM-score-based metrics. Additionally, GATE also performed consistently on large in-house datasets generated by extensive AlphaFold-based sampling with MULTICOM4, confirming its robustness and practical applicability in real-world model selection scenarios. Availability and implementation: GATE is available at https://github.com/BioinfoMachineLearning/GATE.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.