Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799464›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Calculated Versus Estimated Blood Loss in Plastic Breast Surgery.

Carly M Wareham, Gabriel De La Cruz Ku, Manish M Karamchandani, Abhishek Chatterjee, Sarah M Persing, Christopher Homsy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carly M WarehamFrom the Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Gabriel De La Cruz KuUniversidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.
Manish M KaramchandaniFrom the Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Abhishek ChatterjeeDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Sarah M PersingDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Christopher HomsyDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Estimated blood loss (EBL), based on surgeons' visual estimation of blood loss, guides patient care but is often inaccurate. Calculated blood loss (CBL), a measurement of the volume of blood lost, is a more accurate substitute. Our aim was to assess the differences between EBL and CBL in plastic surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35 patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps, oncoplastic surgery, breast reductions, or mastectomies in 1 hospital over 18 months. Results: The surgeons underestimated EBL (median EBL 250 versus CBL 388 cc, Conclusions: The surgeons underestimate blood loss, but the senior surgeon tended to do so to a lesser extent. Complex and longer procedures tended to have a greater discrepancy between EBL and CBL. CBL should be considered as a reliable alternative to EBL.

Identifiers

PMID40799464
PMCPMC12342120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.