ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2025
Mechanistic insights into the immune biomarker of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of FDG PET/CT and immune profiling with pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Progress in perioperative immunotherapy for lung cancer and analysis of therapy (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Digital immune twins and ai-integrated multi-omic biomarkers: Redefining personalized immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis have revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), demonstrating remarkable efficacy in advanced-stage patients. These therapies have demonstrated durable responses and improved survival outcomes. Recently, perioperative ICIs have emerged as a promising approach for early-stage resectable NSCLC to address high postoperative recurrence rates and improve long-term survival. Clinical trials on adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and a combination of both perioperative ICIs therapies, such as CheckMate 816 and KEYNOTE-671, have demonstrated improvements in pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). However, challenges remain, including low response rates in NSCLC patients and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These factors highlight the urgent need for robust predictive biomarkers to better stratify patients and guide clinical decision-making. While numerous studies have explored the predictive and guiding value of various biomarkers, few have reached clinical application, leaving significant gaps. Moreover, the complexity and heterogeneity of tumor-immune interactions underscore the need for integrated, multimodal predictive models. This review highlights the current state and unresolved challenges in perioperative ICIs treatment for early-stage resectable NSCLC, emphasizing the critical role of biomarkers in advancing these therapies. It provides a comprehensive summary of potential biomarkers identified in recent research, elucidating their predictive mechanisms and interrelationships. The goal is to inspire the discovery of novel biomarkers and support the integration of multiple biomarkers for combined predictive models, ultimately optimizing patient selection and therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.