ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
An online explainable ensemble machine learning model for predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of machine learning-based radiomics models for predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma in Chinese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-invasive determination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status is essential for selecting lung adenocarcinoma patients suitable for EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). This study aimed to develop and validate an online ensemble machine learning (EML) model that combines multiple machine learning (ML) models to predict the EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: A total of 823 lung adenocarcinoma patients with known EGFR mutation status from three medical centers were divided into a training cohort (n=556) and a validation cohort (n=267) (ChiCTR2400083082 in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry). Five ML models incorporating clinical and radiological characteristics-random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-along with a CT-based deep learning (DL) model were constructed to predict EGFR mutation status. Subsequently, an EML model was created by combining these models. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to explain the EML model. Results: In the training cohort, the AUCs for the RF, LR, SVM, LightGBM, XGBoost, DL, and EML were 0.851, 0.790, 0.810, 0.835, 0.853, 0.884, and 0.928, respectively. In the validation cohort, the AUCs for the RF, LR, SVM, LightGBM, XGBoost, DL, and EML were 0.753, 0.744, 0.732, 0.749, 0.751, 0.754, and 0.813, respectively. The Delong test indicated that the AUC of the EML model showed outstanding performance compared to the single models in both the training and validation cohorts. Decision curve analysis indicated that the EML model provided a clinically useful net benefit, and calibration curves showed good agreement. SHAP analysis identified predictive characteristics ranked by their contribution to the EML model: DL score, long-axis diameter, smoking history, pleural retraction, texture, vascular convergence, sex, air bronchogram, and bubblelike lucency. These characteristics were further used to develop an online web tool. Conclusions: The EML model could serve as a non-invasive and accurate method for predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.