Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799416›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

Safety and efficacy of transbronchial radiofrequency ablation for stage IA peripheral lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Siyuan Hong, Lin Ye, Junxiang Chen, Fangfang Xie, Chuanjia Gu, Du Xu, George Cheng, Jiayuan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siyuan Hong *Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lin Ye *Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Junxiang Chen *Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fangfang Xie *Department of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chuanjia GuDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Du XuDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
George ChengDivision of Pumonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and Physiology, University of California San Diego (UCSD), San Diego, CA, USA.
Jiayuan SunDepartment of Respiratory Endoscopy, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a commonly used treatment for inoperable early-stage lung cancer, though it carries a significant risk of complications. Transbronchial RFA has emerged as a promising alternative, but robust clinical evidence supporting its adoption remains scarce. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of transbronchial RFA in treating early-stage peripheral lung cancer. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with early-stage (IA) peripheral lung cancer who underwent transbronchial RFA due to inoperability or refusal of surgery from August 2020 to December 2023. All patients underwent transbronchial RFA under the guidance of X-ray or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The safety endpoint included the incidence of adverse events in the month after ablation. The efficacy endpoints involved the local control progression-free survival (LPFS), as well as the factors affecting therapeutic outcomes. Results: A total of 46 patients with 51 tumors underwent 55 transbronchial RFA procedures. The mean age of patients was 67.7 years, and the mean lesion size was 16.4 mm. Adverse events and intervention-acquired adverse events were reported in 11.5% and 9.8% of participants. The local control analysis revealed 1-, 2-, and 3-year LPFS rates of 87.5%, 73.4%, and 69.8%, respectively. The efficacy predictor analysis revealed that transbronchial RFA guided by CBCT had significantly better LPFS compared to that of X-ray guidance (1- and 3-year LPFS rates: 97.2% Conclusions: Transbronchial RFA for peripheral lung cancer showed a favorable safety profile. The efficacy of transbronchial RFA was also evaluated, and it was found that CBCT-guided bronchial ablation had better outcomes. Future studies will require prospective randomized controlled trials to further confirm its efficacy.

Indexed as

bronchoscopylung cancerRadiofrequency ablation (RFA)

Identifiers

PMID40799416
PMCPMC12337045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.