Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799402›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of disability2025

An Ubuntu approach to disability and inclusive development for women with disabilities.

Theresa Lorenzo, Maximus M Sefotho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of disability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Theresa LorenzoDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Division of Disability Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6523-8189
Maximus M SefothoDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Division of Disability Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0704-1983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vicious cycles of disability and poverty isolate disabled women, making it difficult for them to meet their own and their family's human needs. Their exclusion and deprivations may be bridged through inclusive development processes. The article presents an Afro-centric approach to inclusive development that speaks to experiences of disabled women who lived in informal settlements in the Cape Town metropole, South Africa that also has relevance for marginalised and oppressed communities in the Global North. Objectives: To describe how human scale development (HSD) as a conceptual framework resonates with Ubuntu values and principles to enable individual and collective action spaces to overcome human poverties. Method: Reflexivity was done to explicate and further conceptualise an Ubuntu approach to community-based inclusive development for disabled women. Results: Analysis revealed the centrality of Ubuntu values in effecting social change through bi-directional shifts in self and collective identities, and a spirituality of disability. Themes included Conclusion: Ubuntu as an African philosophy draws on indigenous knowledge systems that provide an Afro-centric approach to inclusive development of disabled women. Ubuntu promotes a reflexive, person-centred and collective approach to human development at the micro-level. Contribution: Harnessing the power of learning to listen deeply to each other's stories facilitates the interdependence and spirituality of Ubuntu to create supportive, inclusive development.

Indexed as

action reflectioncommunity-based rehabilitationdisabilityhuman scale developmentinclusive developmentnarrativesparticipatory action researchsocial changespiritualityUbuntu

Identifiers

PMID40799402
PMCPMC12339866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.