ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2025
Fine-tuning large language models for interdisciplinary environmental challenges.
Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Traditional Machine Learning to Fine-Tuning Large Language Models: A Review for Sensors-Based Soil Moisture Forecasting.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing specialized fields by enabling advanced reasoning and data synthesis. Environmental science, however, poses unique hurdles due to its interdisciplinary scope, specialized jargon, and heterogeneous data from climate dynamics to ecosystem management. Despite progress in subdomains like hydrology and climate modeling, no integrated framework exists to generate high-quality, domain-specific training data or evaluate LLM performance across the discipline. Here we introduce a unified pipeline to address this gap. It comprises EnvInstruct, a multi-agent system for prompt generation; ChatEnv, a balanced 100-million-token instruction dataset spanning five core themes (climate change, ecosystems, water resources, soil management, and renewable energy); and EnvBench, a 4998-item benchmark assessing analysis, reasoning, calculation, and description tasks. Applying this pipeline, we fine-tune an 8-billion-parameter model, EnvGPT, which achieves 92.06 ± 1.85 % accuracy on the independent EnviroExam benchmark-surpassing the parameter-matched LLaMA-3.1-8B baseline by ∼8 percentage points and rivaling the closed-source GPT-4o-mini and the 9-fold larger Qwen2.5-72B. On EnvBench, EnvGPT earns top LLM-assigned scores for relevance (4.87 ± 0.11), factuality (4.70 ± 0.15), completeness (4.38 ± 0.19), and style (4.85 ± 0.10), outperforming baselines in every category. This study reveals how targeted supervised fine-tuning on curated domain data can propel compact LLMs to state-of-the-art levels, bridging gaps in environmental applications. By openly releasing EnvGPT, ChatEnv, and EnvBench, our work establishes a reproducible foundation for accelerating LLM adoption in environmental research, policy, and practice, with potential extensions to multimodal and real-time tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.