Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799338›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

When happiness strengthens engagement and performance: the role of happiness at work as a resource for experienced employees and newcomers.

Patrik Fröhlich, Elvira Radaca, Stefan Diestel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patrik Fröhlich *Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Elvira Radaca *Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Stefan Diestel *Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research investigates the interactive effects of happiness at work and interest taking on work engagement and extra-productive behaviors across experienced employees and newcomers. Objective: The article investigates how happiness at work can serve as a key resource in enhancing work engagement and extra-productive behaviors such as adaptive performance and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in newcomers and experienced employees. Furthermore, it clarifies the interactive effects of the personal resource interest-taking in enhancing the effectiveness of happiness at work, particularly by examining how interest-taking moderates the relationship between happiness at work and work engagement. Methods: We conducted two longitudinal studies among newcomers ( Results: Across both studies, our findings indicate indirect effects of happiness at work on extra-productive behavior via work engagement. Interest-taking strengthens the impact of happiness at work on work engagement for newcomers but not for experienced employees. These new insights into the relationship between happiness at work, work engagement, and extra-productive behavior can aid organizations in enhancing the performance and motivation of employees. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that happiness at work indirectly promotes OCB and adaptive performance through increased work engagement for all employees, regardless of their tenure. The moderating role of interest-taking is especially relevant for newcomers, suggesting that organizations can boost positive outcomes by fostering happiness at work in early tenure.

Indexed as

adaptive performanceexperienced employeeshappiness at workinterest-takingnewcomersorganizational citizenship behavior (OCB)work engagement

Identifiers

PMID40799338
PMCPMC12341457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.