Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799304›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2025

Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Enhances Outcomes and Foraminal Decompression in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Zhan Peng, Yu Xiong, Yukun Jia, Jin Li, Zhuobin Liu, Guangye Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhan Peng *Department of Spinal Surgery, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yu Xiong *Department of Spinal Surgery, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yukun JiaDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jin LiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhuobin LiuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Guangye WangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design Retrospective cohort study Objective: This study compared the safety and efficacy of ultrasonic bone scalpel-assisted direct decompression versus conventional direct decompression (using high-speed drills and Kerrison rongeurs) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical radiculopathy with foraminal bone stenosis. This retrospective cohort study included 94 patients who underwent cervical foraminal stenosis surgery from 2019 to 2022. Group A (n=48) received traditional direct decompression using a high-speed drill and Kerrison rongeur, while Group B (n=46) underwent direct decompression using a combination of drilling and ultrasonic bone scalpel. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI) for functional disability, and smallest oblique sagittal area (SOSA) of the neural foramen on CT scans to evaluate foraminal enlargement. Results: Patients in Group B demonstrated significantly greater improvements in VAS and NDI scores (p<0.01), with a larger mean SOSA (73.85 mm² vs 50.00 mm²) compared to Group A. Additionally, Group B showed a reduction in blood loss and shorter operative time. No significant differences in complication rates, including dural tears or nerve root injuries, were found between the two groups. Conclusion: The ultrasonic bone scalpel-assisted decompression technique offers significant advantages over traditional methods in terms of surgical outcomes, including better pain relief, functional recovery, and foraminal enlargement, while maintaining comparable safety profiles.

Indexed as

ACDFanterior cervical discectomy and fusionforaminotomysmallest oblique sagittal areaultrasonic bone scalpel

Identifiers

PMID40799304
PMCPMC12341824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.