Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Training systems affect spatial distribution of Korla fragrant pear (

Pan Yan, Yonghui Deng, Shi-Jie An, Ling Ma, Tianle Li, Qi-Ling Chen, Qiangqing Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pan YanInstitute of Forestry and Horticulture of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Tiemenguan Test Station of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corp Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm Innovation and Quality Improvement and Efficiency Increment, Shihezi, China.
Yonghui DengInstitute of Forestry and Horticulture of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Tiemenguan Test Station of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corp Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm Innovation and Quality Improvement and Efficiency Increment, Shihezi, China.
Shi-Jie AnInstitute of Forestry and Horticulture of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Tiemenguan Test Station of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corp Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm Innovation and Quality Improvement and Efficiency Increment, Shihezi, China.
Ling MaInstitute of Forestry and Horticulture of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Tiemenguan Test Station of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corp Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm Innovation and Quality Improvement and Efficiency Increment, Shihezi, China.
Tianle LiInstitute of Forestry and Horticulture of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Tiemenguan Test Station of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corp Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm Innovation and Quality Improvement and Efficiency Increment, Shihezi, China.
Qi-Ling ChenInstitute of Forestry and Horticulture of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Tiemenguan Test Station of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corp Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm Innovation and Quality Improvement and Efficiency Increment, Shihezi, China.
Qiangqing ZhengInstitute of Forestry and Horticulture of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Tiemenguan Test Station of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corp Key Laboratory of Korla Fragrant Pear Germplasm Innovation and Quality Improvement and Efficiency Increment, Shihezi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to elucidate the relationship between canopy structure and fruit spatial distribution, establish a model linking canopy light distribution with fruit positioning, and identify optimal training strategies for consistently high yield. The findings provide a theoretical foundation for optimizing modern cultivation practices in Korla fragrant pear orchards. Methods: Four training treatments were established: precision pruning, reduction, falling head, and thinning. Canopy structural parameters and light distribution were measured, along with canopy light interception (ALI). Fruit number and individual fruit weight were recorded at different canopy positions. Correlation analysis was used to revealing the relationship between canopy structure, light distribution, and spatial distribution of fruits. Results: (1) Canopy Structure: Reduction and falling head effectively controlled canopy spread, significantly reduced the proportion of long branches while increased the proportion of middle branches. Thinning, however, increased the proportion of long branches, total branch length and average branch length, led to significant expansion in canopy diameter, surface area, and volume. (2) Light Distribution: Reduction increased average light interception (ALI) by 15%, while thinning improved ALI by 11% significantly, enhanced light availability across different canopy aspects, falling head notably improved light penetration in the middle and lower canopy layers. Persistent low-light zones (ALI < 300 μmol·m Conclusion: The influence of canopy structure and light distribution on fruit spatial distributions depends on canopy size. For small canopies, canopy structure serves as the dominant factor affecting fruit distribution, while in large canopies, light distribution becomes the primary driver. Accordingly, distinct canopy management strategies should be adopted, small canopies should focus on increasing canopy surface area and total branch length, to increase fruiting sites and enhance yield, large canopies require optimizing light distribution to improve fruit spatial uniformity. Thinning promoted flower bud formation significantly by increased the proportion of long branches and lateral branch number, thereby optimized consistently high yield traits.

Indexed as

canopy structurefruit spatial distributionlight distributionPyrus sinkiangensis Yuyield

Identifiers

PMID40799276
PMCPMC12339572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.