ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Case Report: Is the isolated bone change in advanced colorectal cancer necessarily malignant metastasis?
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiation osteitis (RO) is a bone-related complication following radiotherapy (RT), often characterized by atypical imaging features. It is challenging to distinguish RO from early bone metastasis (BM), potentially leading to inappropriate treatment. Therefore, establishing reliable diagnostic criteria for accurately identifying RO is essential for improving treatment outcomes in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Case description: Two cases of advanced CRC patients with atypical isolated bone changes on imaging are presented. Both patients received standard chemotherapy and radiotherapy after surgery. Through comprehensive imaging studies, laboratory evaluations, and multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultations, the diagnosis of RO was confirmed instead of BM, thereby avoiding the need for an invasive pathological biopsy. Conclusions: This case report highlights imaging features of RO and provides valuable insights into differentiating RO from BM by integrating medical history, laboratory findings, and imaging results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.