ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Case Report: Unveiling the hidden: a rare case of endometrial tuberculosis presenting as peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometrial tuberculosis (TB) is a rare form of extrapulmonary TB, particularly uncommon in postmenopausal women. Its atypical presentation, characterized by nonspecific symptoms, often leads to misdiagnosis, particularly when it is confused with malignancies. Moreover, peritoneal tuberculosis, although rare, can further complicate the diagnostic process due to its clinical manifestations that resemble those of various cancerous conditions. The coexistence of both endometrial and peritoneal TB in the same patient is particularly unusual and presents a significant diagnostic challenge. Case presentation: We report the case of a 49-year-old perimenopausal woman who presented with chronic pelvic pain, ascites, and postmenopausal bleeding. Initial imaging raised suspicion for peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, histopathological and microbiological investigations confirmed the diagnosis of endometrial and peritoneal tuberculosis. The diagnosis was established by the detection of acid-fast bacilli and granulomas in the biopsies from the endometrium and peritoneum. The patient was successfully treated with a standard anti-TB regimen, showing a favorable clinical response and gradual resolution of symptoms. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of considering tuberculosis in the differential diagnosis of pelvic pathologies, particularly in endemic regions where TB is prevalent. It highlights the need for thorough investigation in cases of atypical pelvic symptoms in patients with risk factors, even in the absence of clear pulmonary symptoms. Including tuberculosis in the differential diagnosis could prevent misdiagnosis and allow for more prompt and appropriate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.