Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799212›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2025

Vivid imagery of objects primes perception of subliminal spatial information.

Gabriel Byczynski, Amedeo D'Angiulli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Imagery: Interference, facilitation, and theory.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriel ByczynskiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Geneva and University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8273-1605
Amedeo D'AngiulliNeuroscience of Imagination, Cognition, and Emotion Research Lab, Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of imagination with perception of reality is associated with numerous neurocognitive and biological adaptive functions. Given the overlap between neural processes and regions governing internally versus externally generated imagery, the interaction between these processual components of high-level vision has been studied for over a century, without yielding a satisfactory account. Opposite to traditional theories like the Perky effect or sensory boost, we hypothesized that voluntary conscious mental imagery of an object enhances the processing of unconscious incoming visual spatial information. Hence, aspects of internal imagery such as vividness or motion should drive such an interaction. We probed how subliminal spatial information might be influenced under imagery conditions. Using behavioural data, we show that imagery improves the unconscious concurrent perception of visual spatial information. This priming effect seems driven by the gradient of imagery vividness: both explicitly required by task demands and implicitly generated. We found that imagery can direct visual perception when the visual system is strongly biased towards predicting that an object is present. Because the observed results vary systematically with self-reported vividness, rather than being epiphenomenal, the subjective experience of vividness is a deterministic condition for imagery priming.

Indexed as

awarenessDefault Mode Netwrok (DMN)externalization (out-of-body)subliminal processingvisual acuityvisual mental imageryvisual processing streamsvisuo-spatial perceptionvividness

Identifiers

PMID40799212
PMCPMC12342863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.