ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2025
Vivid imagery of objects primes perception of subliminal spatial information.
Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Imagery: Interference, facilitation, and theory.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of imagination with perception of reality is associated with numerous neurocognitive and biological adaptive functions. Given the overlap between neural processes and regions governing internally versus externally generated imagery, the interaction between these processual components of high-level vision has been studied for over a century, without yielding a satisfactory account. Opposite to traditional theories like the Perky effect or sensory boost, we hypothesized that voluntary conscious mental imagery of an object enhances the processing of unconscious incoming visual spatial information. Hence, aspects of internal imagery such as vividness or motion should drive such an interaction. We probed how subliminal spatial information might be influenced under imagery conditions. Using behavioural data, we show that imagery improves the unconscious concurrent perception of visual spatial information. This priming effect seems driven by the gradient of imagery vividness: both explicitly required by task demands and implicitly generated. We found that imagery can direct visual perception when the visual system is strongly biased towards predicting that an object is present. Because the observed results vary systematically with self-reported vividness, rather than being epiphenomenal, the subjective experience of vividness is a deterministic condition for imagery priming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.