ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
Optimizing premedications for multiple sclerosis patients treated with ocrelizumab: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic neurological disease, is typically managed with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) to reduce relapse rates and slow disease progression. Some of these DMTs can cause infusion-related reactions (INRRs), which range from mild symptoms to severe allergic reactions. Corticosteroids are commonly used in premedication regimens to mitigate INRRs. However, long-term use of corticosteroids carries health risks. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of a standard corticosteroid regimen with an adjusted, low-dose regimen in reducing INRRs among people living with MS, receiving ocrelizumab (Xacrel), with the goal of optimizing safety while minimizing corticosteroid exposure. Methods: In a single-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at Sina Hospital, 200 adult patients with MS who had previously received ocrelizumab were recruited and randomly assigned to either a standard or adjusted premedication regimen groups. The standard regimen group (n = 101) received 100 mg intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone, along with cetirizine and acetaminophen tablets as premedication, while the adjusted regimen group (n = 99) received a reduced dose of 8 mg IV dexamethasone. The incidence of INRRs and their severity was monitored up to 1-hour post-infusion and 24-h post-infusion. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests and logistic regression, were used to evaluate the frequency of INRRs, characterize symptom profiles, and identify potential predictive factors for INRRs occurrence. Results: Overall, the standard premedication demonstrated more efficacy in reducing the occurrence of INRRs, while the adjusted regimen group showed a significantly higher incidence of INRRs compared to the standard regimen group (78.8% vs. 40.6%, p-value <0.01). Specific INRRs symptoms, such as itching (29.3% in the adjusted group vs. 8.3% in the standard group, p-value <0.01) and throat irritation (65.7% vs. 31.7%, p-value <0.01), were notably more frequent in the adjusted regimen group. Most INRRs were mild to moderate in severity in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of severe reactions between the two groups. Notably, a history of INRRs from previous infusions was identified as a strong predictor of INRRs in the current study, with an odds ratio of 6.27 (95% CI: 3.36-11.70), highlighting the importance of patients' history in managing INRRs risk. Conclusions: The standard premedication regimen was more effective in reducing INRRs in people living with MS, receiving Xacrel compared to the reduced corticosteroid regimen. However, the findings suggest that a lower corticosteroid regimen may be beneficial for some patients, as there was no significant difference in the incidence of severe INRRs between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.