ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Comparison between femoral nerve block and pericapsular nerve group block as preemptive analgesia in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures: A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regional Anesthesia Strategies in Orthopedic Trauma.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Regional blocks such as femoral nerve block (FNB) and Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block are frequently used for postoperative pain relief in fractures around the hip joint. This study compares the analgesic efficacy of PENG block with FNB in the management of intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: This randomised controlled clinical trial included patients aged 65-80 years with intertrochanteric fractures who were planned for closed reduction and cephalomedullary nailing. The patients were randomised into two groups: Group 1 (n = 40) received FNB, while Group 2 (n = 40) received PENG block preoperatively. The outcome measures were postoperative VAS score, total opioid consumption, quadriceps power, and duration of mobilisation. Results: There was a significant reduction in postoperative pain in both groups. A comparison between the FNB and PENG blocks showed no significant difference in VAS scores at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h. The PENG group had better quadriceps strength preservation at 12 h (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between the two groups at 60 h. The total opioid consumption in the first 48 h was similar in both groups (8.03 Morphine milliequivalents (MME) in PENG and 7.07 MME in the FNB group, p-value >0.05). Conclusion: PENG block and FNB are equally effective in pain relief and in reducing opioid requirements in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. However, the PENG group showed better preservation of quadriceps strength at 12 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.