SynthesisThe European journal of general practice2025
Barriers and facilitators to primary care staff conducting research - a qualitative systematic review.
Synthesis in The European journal of general practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rewiring the Research Enterprise: Why Primary Care Is the Next Frontier.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Perceptions of challenges in clinical pediatric research: a survey of Italian pediatricians.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators for using research-based knowledge - A qualitative study on first-line managers' perspectives in municipal health and care services.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- How to Build Health Practitioners Research Capacity: An Umbrella Review.Health services insights · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2026
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch is vital for progress and development of healthcare and may help relieve current health service pressures through improvements and efficiencies. Research in primary care is not well established and is not part of routine practice. This study aims to investigate the barriers and facilitators to primary care staff conducting research.
methodA systematic literature review was conducted in CINAHL, Medline, APA, PsycInfo, AHMED and EMBASE from inception to April 2023. Searches were for studies involving clinical or non-clinical staff working in primary care where barriers or facilitators to conducting research were examined.
resultsTwenty-one studies were included from 2000 to 2022. The QuADs quality appraisal method found that papers were of varying, often low quality. Five themes were found - research beliefs & understanding, time, funding & recognition, skills & knowledge, administration & support, ethics & understanding and communication & people. Staff thought research useful but optional and were impeded by time and funding. They need training and support to carry out research. Communication from the researchers before, during and after study completion would prevent problems and lead to more research participation in the future.
conclusionImproved communication at all stages would serve as a facilitator to primary care staff conducting research. Clear, appropriate training for all staff would allow them to complete appropriate tasks for their roles and prevent one individual taking full responsibility. Embedding research in primary care with protected time and resources to complete it would remove barriers to taking part.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.