ArticleESC heart failure2025
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adults with acute heart failure in a South African teaching hospital.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Cardiac Comorbidities in Acute Heart Failure: Phenotype-Specific Insights from Sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adults with acute heart failure in a South African teaching hospital.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsIn sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the clinical profile and in-hospital outcomes of adults with acute heart failure (HF) based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) categories are unknown. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients admitted with acute HF based on LVEF categories and their association with in-hospital outcomes.
methodsFour hundred six consecutive patients with acute HF were enrolled in this prospective study between February and November 2023. The patients were stratified into three categories: HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The primary outcome measure was all-cause in-hospital mortality. The prevalence and outcomes of various LVEF phenotypes were evaluated in adult patients with acute HF.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 54.94 ± 15.83 years, of whom 207 (51%) were female (P = 0.004). Two hundred fifty-seven (63.3%) patients had HFrEF, 62 (15.3%) had HFmrEF, and 87 (21.4%) had HFpEF. Patients with HFpEF were older and predominantly female and had a higher median global longitudinal score and lower N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (P < 0.001). The all-cause in-hospital mortality was 3.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-6.0] without significant variation across LVEF phenotypes (P = 0.70). In the multivariable model after adjusting for age and sex, higher C-reactive protein levels [odds ratio (OR): 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.03; P = 0.009], elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.29; P = 0.012), elevated serum potassium (OR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.23-9.43; P = 0.018), moderate aortic regurgitation (AR) (OR: 12.80; 95% CI: 1.12-101.29; P = 0.016) and severe AR (OR: 34.49; 95% CI: 3.77-353.47; P = 0.002) were observed. Low diastolic blood pressure was associated with a reduced mortality risk (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.89-0.99; P = 0.045).
conclusionsIn our study, HFrEF was the predominant phenotype, and each phenotype exhibited distinct clinical and biomarker profiles. All-cause in-hospital mortality was low and did not differ significantly across the phenotypes. Independent predictors of mortality included markers of inflammation, electrolyte imbalance and moderate-to-severe AR. These findings highlight the need for targeted risk stratification and management strategies to improve the outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.