ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2025
Cognitive Phenotyping of Parkinson's Disease Patients Via Digital Analysis of Spoken Word Properties.
Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semantic memory navigation in mild cognitive impairment: Automated markers with neural and biofluid correlates.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Article
- The include network: Advancing cross-linguistic equity in brain health research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Digital Technologies for Symptom Monitoring in Parkinson Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Automated Speech Markers of Alzheimer Dementia: Test of Cross-Linguistic Generalizability.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive symptoms are highly prevalent in Parkinson's disease (PD), often manifesting as mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Yet, their detection and characterization remain suboptimal because standard approaches rely on subjective impressions derived from lengthy, univariate tests.
objectiveWe examined whether digital analysis of verbal fluency predicts cognitive status in PD.
methodsWe asked 464 Spanish speakers with PD to complete taxonomic (animal), thematic (supermarket), and phonemic (/p/) fluency tasks. We quantified six response properties: semantic variability, granularity, concreteness, length, frequency, and phonological neighborhood. In Study 1, these properties were fed to a ridge regressor to predict Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) scores and subscores. In Study 2, we used the same properties to compare (via a generalized linear model) and classify (via random forest) between 123 patients with and 124 without MCI.
resultsIn Study 1, predicted MDRS scores and subscores strongly correlated with actual ones, adjusting for clinical and cognitive variables (R = 0.51, P < 0.001). In Study 2, MCI patients' words were less semantically variable, less concrete, and shorter, adjusting for clinical and cognitive variables (P-values < 0.05). Machine learning discrimination between patients with and without MCI was robust in the validation set (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.76), with good generalization to unseen pre-surgical (AUC = 0.68) and post-surgical (AUC = 0.72) samples, surpassing MDRS scores (AUC = 0.54). Results were consistently driven by semantic variability, granularity, and concreteness.
conclusionsDigital word property analysis predicts cognitive symptom severity and distinguishes between cognitive phenotypes of PD, enabling scalable neuropsychological screenings. © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.