ReviewPest management science2025
An overview of agricultural neonicotinoid regulation in the EU, Canada, and the United States.
Review in Pest management science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Larval antibiosis to cabbage stem flea beetle (Psylliodes chrysocephala) is absent within oilseed rape (Brassica napus).Pest management science · 2026Article
- Influence of anthranilic diamide insecticides on emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) larvae and establishment of introduced parasitoids in central Kentucky.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Article
- Article
- Sweet products, subtle residues: neonicotinoid contaminations in commercial honey from Thailand.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Flupyradifurone impairs the processing of sound signals by the ascending interneurons AN1 and AN2 that convey auditory information to the cricket brain.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neonicotinoids are a widely used class of insecticides partly due to their low acute risk to non-target organisms. However, increasing concerns over their long-term chronic effects on pollinators and other species of concern have led to increased governmental regulations since the mid-2010s, particularly in agricultural settings. These regulations have varied in terms of approach, geography, and timeline, starting with a ban implemented by the European Union (EU) and evolving into exemption-based regulations across two Canadian provinces and five US states as of this writing. While the landscape of neonicotinoid regulation in agriculture is rapidly evolving, it is pertinent to review what contexts led to different regulatory approaches in each of these cases, what templates for regulation exist, and what the consequences of such approaches have been up to this point. This review aims to enhance understanding of the potential future of agricultural neonicotinoid regulation across time and space. © 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.