Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40798841›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2025

Long-Term System Suitability Evaluation for Mass Accuracy in the Analysis of Small Molecules by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Paul Löffler, Svante Rehnstam, Lutz Ahrens, Foon Yin Lai, Alberto Celma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul LöfflerDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1959-0752
Svante RehnstamDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8039-2600
Lutz AhrensDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5430-6764
Foon Yin LaiDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden.
Alberto CelmaDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9763-8737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) is critical for the identification and characterization of (un)known organic chemicals. In this regard, ensuring high mass accuracy in HRMS instruments is essential for reliable results in nontarget and suspect screening. This study presents a practical approach for evaluating and maintaining mass accuracy over time using ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization Orbitrap HRMS. A set of 13 reference standards, encompassing a range of polarities and chemical families, was analyzed before and after sample analysis batches to assess the impact of various factors on the instrumental performance regarding mass accuracy. The aim is not to recalibrate the system but to provide a reliable snapshot of the mass accuracy over time. The study found that the positive ionization mode exhibited higher accuracy and precision compared with the negative mode. Factors affecting mass accuracy included calibration quality, the number of batch injections, and the time between calibrations, where the two latter factors were related to each other. Results suggest that performing system suitability tests for high-resolution accurate masses with two injections before and after sample analysis is adequate for ensuring acceptable mass spectrometric performance for robust and reliable HRMS data acquisition, but performing three injections is recommended. This protocol ensures that informed decisions can be made with regard to the mass accuracy, the calibration, and a potential recalibration before HRMS data acquisition is performed.

Indexed as

instrumental performancenontarget screeningOrbitrapquality assurancereproducibilitysuspect screening

Identifiers

PMID40798841
PMCPMC12412142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.